• Share this site
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Contact Us
PlumbReport.com
  • Plumb Perspective Editorial
  • Plumb Performance Portfolio
  • Guide to Investing
  • Q & A
  • Resources & Recommendations

Q & A:

October, 2008

Q: Are you saying Warren Buffett’s got it wrong?

Q: I think most of your readers will have difficulty evaluating the relative merits of your plan versus the Paulson plan.  Here is Buffett’s read on the Paulson Plan.

Charlie Rose Interview with Warren Buffett Oct 2 2008

The gist of Buffett’s comments follow.  Are you saying he’s got it wrong?

Warren Buffett:  Well, they need plenty of money and they really need plenty of flexibility to carry out this plan. They also need in my view to very much tie it to market prices. I have said, Charlie, that the 700 billion, if they buy mortgage-related securities or mortgages themselves at current market prices, they’re going to make money over time because the United States government has staying power and it has a low cost of borrowing. And if I could take one percent of that $700 billion pot and take the gain or loss from it and be their partner, and they would buy the stuff at market, I’d make a lot of money. It’s — I mean you have hedge funds and people like that buying these assets to yield 15 or 20 percent, I mean, that’s the buyer for these people that are trying to unload them. The U.S. Treasury has got borrowing costs like nobody else has. They can borrow basically unlimited amounts. They can stay there for years and years.  These assets will be worth more money over time. So when Merrill Lynch sells a bunch of mortgage-related assets at 22 cents on the dollar like they did a month or so ago, the buyer goes — is going to make money, and he’s going to make a lot more money if it happens to be an institution like the U.S. government which has very, very cheap borrowing costs.

Charlie Rose:  So you are saying to those taxpayers who are worried about what’s going to happen to the $700 billion, chances are good that when these securities are purchased and sold, you’ll get a lot of your money back.

Warren Buffett:  I think [inaudible].

Charlie Rose:  Or all of your money back, and maybe something else [spelled phonetically].

Warren Buffett:  I would bet on it. I mean, if I got a chance to take one percent of the deal either way, I would make that bet. When Berkshire Hathaway laid out three billion dollars for GE today, we didn’t spend it, we invested it. When the Federal government buys the mortgages, they’re not spending it, they’re investing it. Now, they’re investing it in distress type assets but they’re buying them at distress prices if they buy them at market. It’s the kind of stuff I love to do. I just don’t have $700 billion. Maybe we could go in it together.  [laughter]  You know, with your money and my brains, I mean, there’s no telling how far we’d go.

A: I think most of my readers are able to evaluate the relative merits of my plan versus the Paulson plan.  They’re pretty interested in the economy and investing or they wouldn’t have requested my letter in the first place.  From the e-mails and questions I’ve received, I think they get it.

I don’t think Buffet’s got it wrong, but I also don’t think he’s seen my plan, yet.

Both plans have the government buying distressed mortgage debt at a discount to face value.  The government then receives any cash flows that troubled homeowners can pay on this debt.  What Buffett is describing above is that the government could receive cash flows from the troubled homeowners in excess of what the government pays to buy the debt.

My plan doesn’t envision trying to do this.  I don’t think it would help the problem for any of us to try to make a profit off of the troubled homeowners.  The way I’ve laid out my plan, the discount at which the government buys the debt would be passed on to the troubled mortgage holders.  This would make it more likely that they will be able to service their mortgage debt and stay in their home.  In the long-run, I think this would be more beneficial to all of the taxpayers.

Be Sociable, Share!
  • Tweet

Tags: economy, financial crisis, housing, The Plumb Plan
Posted in Q&A | No Comments »

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

What's New

  • Q&A
  • Articles
  • Books
  • Sites
  • Videos
  • Article Review:

    September, 2011

    Going to the Johns–Mauldin and Hussman

    I’ve mentioned John Mauldin many times in the past and it’s time to do it again.  John publishes a free weekly letter that I never miss.  It requires registration, but I never receive junk mail as a result of having registered.  His latest letter, Preparing for a Credit Crisis, is reason enough to sign up.  In this latest missive, John gives us an up-to-the minute overview of the problems and costs facing Europe, the increasing likelihood of a U.S. (global) recession, the outlook for another 2008-style credit crisis and what the average investor might want to think about doing in the face of all of this. Read more…

  • Book Review:

    May, 2011

    Debts, Deficits and the Demise of the American Economy

    Debts, Deficits and the Demise of the American Economy by Peter Tanous and Jeff Cox is about as close to the book I would write right now as I can imagine.  It explains today’s economic mess and the unfolding financial crisis in straightforward language that doesn’t require a degree in economics.

    Read more…
  • Video Review:

    January, 2011

    Quantitative Easing Explained

    A number of subscribers forwarded this video to me and it’s making the rounds in financial circles.  If you’re still unclear about the phenomenon I refer to as “Queasing,” this should clear up any questions.  Warning:  After watching this video, you may not be able to hear the name Ben Bernanke without wanting to call him “The Bernank.”  It’s like one of those songs that gets stuck in your head.  If you like the absurd, I think you’ll like “Quantitative Easing Explained.”

Plumb's Guide to Investing

  •  

Over the years, many people have asked me for investment advice. This section is my answer to the question, “Chip, what are you doing with your portfolio?” It details the portfolio I use to implement my investment strategy— the Plumb Performance Portfolio©

  • What is the Plumb Performance Portfolio?
  • Our Philosophy
  • Rationale
  • Instructions
  • Maintaining Your Assets
  • Plumb Perspective Editorial Archive

Plumb Performance Portfolio

  •  

Further details and return history about the Plumb Performance Portfolio.

  • PPP Asset Allocation
  • Last Month in Review
  • Rationale
  • Historical Results

Questions & Answers

  • May, 2011
    Q: Can you comment on building positions within the PPP?
  • June, 2010
    Q: How does the gold/silver ratio impact your allocation?
  • April, 2010
    Q: How important is it to adjust my allocations monthly?
  • January, 2010
    Q: What about individual TIPS vs. a TIPS fund?
  • November, 2009
    Q: Do you see REITs as totally miserable?

Resources & Recommendations

  • Articles
  • Books
  • Websites
  • Videos

About Us

  • Who is Chip Plumb?
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer
  • Email Signup
  • Contact Us

Topics

  • economy
  • financial crisis
  • asset allocation
  • personal finance
  • inflation
  • money supply
  • valuations
  • Federal Reserve
  • interest rates
  • precious metals
  • debt
  • bonds
  • housing
  • currency

“...an investor who proposes to ignore near-term market fluctuations needs great resources for safety and must not operate on so large a scale, if at all, with borrowed money. Finally, it is the long-term investor, he who promotes the public interest, who will in practice come in for the most criticism, wherever investment funds are managed by committee or boards or banks. For it is the essence of his behavior that he should be eccentric, unconventional and rash in the eyes of average opinion. If he is successful, that will only confirm the general belief in his rashness, and if in the short run he is unsuccessful, which is very likely, he will not receive much mercy. Worldly wisdom teaches that it is better for reputation to fail conventionally than to succeed unconventionally.”

– Lord John Maynard Keynes


  • Plumb Perspective Editorial
  • Plumb Performance Portfolio
  • Guide to Investing
  • Q & A
  • Resources & Recommendations

Disclaimer | Terms of Service | Contact

©2009 PlumbReport.com

The opinions as to portfolio allocation and specific investment vehicles contained herein are solely the opinions of the author and are not intended to be specific recommendations which would be suitable for every investor. The suitability of any specific investment or recommendation is dependent upon many subjective factors and characteristics of the individual investor including, but not limited to, particular investment objectives, risk tolerance, investment horizon or timeline, net worth, overall portfolio allocation and income needs. Specific investments may be suitable for some investors and yet unsuitable for others due to different needs and objectives. All readers should carefully consider their individual objectives and needs and should consult with their investment and financial advisor as to the suitability of any particular investment. The author specifically disclaims any liability or responsibility for any losses, which may result from any investment or allocation referenced herein.